A central role for community consultation and participation and Tools for Knowledge and Learning.

The need for early social/economic analysis which would aid programming and programme monitoring, for joint rapid assessments.

The top lessons learned from an interagency perspective included:

The use of humanitarian standards such as Sphere.

The existence of a longer-term planning and fundraising strategy and.

Having consistent leadership in the development of strategic plans.

Making linkages at community level with local structures and community leaders.

Of the best practices discussed over the two days, five were selected as having been most crucial to improving response time and effectiveness: It presented an opportunity for participants from various organisations to discover for themselves what happened and why, and how to build on strengths and improve on areas of weakness, as well as exploring ways in which they might collaborate more effectively together.ĭuring the workshop, participants discussed best practices and lessons learned in country groups and then discussed these across three themes: accountability, capacity and coordination. The primary purpose was to explore ways in which participant organisations could jointly improve their performance and quality of work by reflecting back on their activities and actions. The AAR focused mainly on the four most affected countries: Indonesia, India, Sri Lanka and Thailand, with additional participation by staff from CARE Somalia. This workshop was a consolidation of a number of country-level learning activities following the crisis caused by the tsunami of 26 December 2004.

Are there any lessons for you personally?Įxample Joint After Action Review by CARE and World Vision International, with OXFAM Great Britain and Catholic Relief Services, April 2005.

What should we have learned from this project a year from now?.

Can you think of a story that summarises your experience of work on this project?.

What next for you in terms of this project?.

What were the two or three key lessons you would share with others?.

What advice would you give yourself if you were to go back to where you were at the start of the project?.

The facilitator asks the team members for crisp and clear, achievable and future-oriented recommendations.Ī Retrospect is a variation on the After Action Review and follows the same format, but involves asking the following more detailed questions: This question is intended to help identify specific actionable recommendations.

What would you do differently next time?.The question ‘Why?’ generates understanding of the root causes of these successes and failures. These questions generate reflection about the successes and failures during the course of the project, activity, event or task.

It follows 2 review